Paper 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 3

Paper 3 - Essay ExampleThis argument attracted substantial opposing replies. One of the most significant responses argued that if at all the public is severely designed then it also means that it presupposes the designer. Further counterargument gives a more emphatic reply by stating that maybe there are possibilities that the design of the world has not yet sufficiently been realized in its full perfection, but not based on arguments that it is not perfect. As such, these are just some(prenominal) of the contributing tenets arousing arguments with respect to handed-down and natural dialogues on trust that in turn impact on the philosophy of reason, pictures and morals.However, even from the counterarguments, further theoretical explanations have the appearance _or_ semblance to question the reliability of the design of the world. This is for instance significantly represented by Darwins theory of evolution. Although Darwins theory indirectly describes the design of the world because it that centers on creation of life through natural selection, it has triggered continued conflict between science and religion (Solomon, Clancy & Higgins, 2012). In particular, the church views Darwins theory as a factor undermining the credibility of the church because it seems to contradict the church teachings about God as the sole creator of the world. However, if one looks at it from a polar perspective from Genesis, the creation was spread across several days, meaning that the idea of natural selection might still hold.Morals, religions, and evil as the three traditional forms of proof for Gods existence have also additionally attracted arguments. Counterarguments suggest that for one to believe in morals, religion and evil it has to start from the belief in God. Furthermore, these arguments also maintain that the three does not adequately provide actual proofs for Gods existence. Emanuel Kant, for instance, as one of the earliest philosophers that offered counterar guments on religion and morals